1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

How good is the 225 Dauntless???

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by 26Rescue02, Sep 25, 2006.

  1. Sep 25, 2006
    26Rescue02

    26Rescue02 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    I recently acquired a ’66 CJ5 with a 225 Dauntless. I was going to resell it, then another early CJ5 owner convinced me to keep it. Now the question is what should I do with it? Is the 225 Dauntless worth keep or should I replace it. The engine, transmission, and transfer seam to all be in good shape. I would like everyone’s opinion.

    Thanks,
     
  2. Sep 25, 2006
    Vhunter

    Vhunter Member

    Redding, California
    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    262
    I would keep the 225 dauntless, its the perfect CJ Jeep motor. Is there something wrong with the way it runs for you to ask if you should keep it?
     
  3. Sep 25, 2006
    MOP

    MOP Active Member

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,131
  4. Sep 25, 2006
    1969 CJ-5

    1969 CJ-5 AZ Native

    Whiteman AFB Misouri
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    154
    Everybody told me to keep the Dauntless instead of swapping in a small block. I am keeping the old 225 'cuz everyone that knows more than me says so.
     
  5. Sep 25, 2006
    26Rescue02

    26Rescue02 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    Everything seams to run fine. I just don't much about the Dauntless engine. Is there a good location for any need parts for the Dauntless?
    Thanks again
     
  6. Sep 25, 2006
    wheelie

    wheelie beeg dummy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor

    York, PA
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,514
    They're junk. May i suggest you bring it to my house for proper disposal?R) As far as i'm concerned, they are the best engine ever in a JEEP. That mill will chug along at very low RPM and keep pulling your JEEP along with it. Get the carb set up right and you're in. Good power, good mpg and different from the rest of the world, but in a good way. Oh and a support network, i.e. ECJ5.com, that's outta this world. I must admit though, I am anxious to try a 4.3 fi motor someday.
     
    Burgermeister likes this.
  7. Sep 25, 2006
    71 Muk WA

    71 Muk WA New Member

    Mukilteo, Washington
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Messages:
    38
  8. Sep 26, 2006
    26Rescue02

    26Rescue02 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    7
    wheelie, If you weren't on the other end of the country I might take you up on that...R) I guess I'll keep it.
     
  9. Sep 26, 2006
    Rampdog

    Rampdog knuckle buster

    Sandy, Oregon
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    105
    I'm closer R) R) R)
     
  10. Sep 26, 2006
    BlueFlu

    BlueFlu past owner of some ecj5's

    Hermitage, TN
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,552
    Depending on where you are, I might be closer. :D
    Ok back to the subject, yes keep it. I'm not a GM fan at all, but I've come to really like the Oddfire and the the way it sounds.
     
  11. Sep 26, 2006
    DanStew

    DanStew Preowned Merkin salesman Staff Member

    Lexington, South...
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    4,585
    the engine is a fine engine. looking at the jeep manual stats it is actually right next to the 304 V8 in power. But the motor is known ot just chug along. The flywheel is extra heavy and the inertia is what helps th elow RPMs. You will find people at the auto stores will know nothing botu the motor, but you can get parts pretty easy. Very simple and reliable is the name of the game and the 225 offers that and more.
     
  12. Sep 26, 2006
    1969 CJ-5

    1969 CJ-5 AZ Native

    Whiteman AFB Misouri
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    154

    Try Autozone. I got my Master re-build kit there for 350 bucks! :)
     
  13. Sep 26, 2006
    Jeep475370

    Jeep475370 New Member

    Hickory NC
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    29
    I am suprised at the torque that they put out!! So far I'm :) with my:v6:
     
  14. Sep 26, 2006
    Grandpot

    Grandpot Old Narc

    South Carolina
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    57
    In South Carolina there is a law against junking an Odd Fire. You are compelled to find it a loving home.
     
  15. Sep 26, 2006
    zed

    zed Iowa- Gateway to Nebraska

    central iowa
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    745
    i love my oddfire 225.the sound is great. best of all it's matched perfectly to the cj5. torque,hp, etc. i can put it into 4wd lowrange 1st gear and it will climb at idle at about 1.5 mph.

    rugged. the carb settings give me a little prob. once in a while. reliable engine. i remember when they started putting them in the cj's (i'm dating myself here ;) ) simple to work on also.

    i have gotten parts from NAPA with no problem. just make sure you spec the ODDFIRE 225. many parts are interchangible with the buck 231 v6 as well from the monza, skylark, etc.

    in the 70's people used to drop a chevy short block into the cj2a. i always felt that the 327 was over powered. i mean the whole cj only weighed about 2400 lbs.
     
  16. Sep 26, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    What would you replace it with? A V8?
    What do you expect from 225 cid?

    By all standards, a Jeep is a light vehicle, and a 225 in proper tune will easily propel it at illegal, even dangerous speeds. The engine is well-suited to that chassis.

    I think you may not have the proper perspective wrt this question.
     
  17. Sep 26, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Dan, that comes up a lot, but I think it's wrong. Generally you cannot compare pre and post 1971 engine power stats because the measuring methods changed. The mfrs started using net hp instead of gross.

    The '71 304 is rated 210 HP and the '72 at 150 - no difference in the engines. The Dauntless is rated 160HP. 210 vs 160, or about 30% HP difference. This is within a few percent of the displacement difference.
     
  18. Sep 26, 2006
    zed

    zed Iowa- Gateway to Nebraska

    central iowa
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    745
    but tim, as you stated earlier, doesn't it really come down to the most appropriate engine matched to a particular chasis/use? all the horses in the world wont help when you need torque, control and reliability. true you can put lots of horses under a cj hood and drive 70 90 or 100mph :shock: (good luck and take a couple of st christopher's medals with you!!!) but the short, light and high cj was never meant for that. in which case that person either needs to find another auto to drive or is lookng to make a show/parade car not an ORV, true?
     
  19. Sep 26, 2006
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    x2. Put me on your list. Will pay cash.

    I think the only thing that would be better than a Dauntless in a JEEP is a Dauntless with FI. I would really like to try GM 4.3 TBI someday, though. Definitely not a small block.
     
  20. Sep 26, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Uh, mm, sure! Are we agreeing? I think we're agreeing.

    :beer: :D
     
    ADKJeep likes this.
New Posts